Attribution Reporting: full system overview

High-level overview of connected services for Attribution Reporting, aimed at technical decision makers.

Published on

Translated to: 日本語

The Attribution Reporting API allows adtechs and advertisers to measure when an ad click or view leads to a conversion, such as a purchase. This API relies on a combination of client-side and server-side integrations, depending on your business needs.

Before continuing, make sure to read the Attribution Reporting overview. This will help you understand the API's purpose and the flow of the different output reports (event-level report and summary reports). If you come across unfamiliar terms, refer to the Privacy Sandbox glossary.

Who is this article for?

You should read this article if:

  • You're an adtech or advertiser's technical decision-maker. You may work in operations, DevOps, data science, IT, marketing, or another role where you make technical implementation decisions. You're wondering how the many proposals for Attribution Reporting systems work together to build a tool for privacy-preserving measurement.
  • You're a technical practitioner (such as a developer, system operator, system architect, or data scientist) who will be setting up experiments with this API and Aggregation Service environment.

Right now, publishers don't have to take any action with this API. If this changes, this article will be updated accordingly.

In this article, you'll read a high-level, end-to-end explanation of how the services work for the Attribution Reporting API. If you're a technical practitioner, you can experiment with this API locally or in production with the unified Privacy Sandbox Relevance and Measurement Origin Trial.

Overview

The Attribution Reporting API consists of many services, which require specific setup, client-side configurations, and server deployments. To determine what you need, first:

  • Make design decisions. Define what information you want to collect, identify what conversions you expect from any given campaign, and determine which report type to collect. The final output is one or both of the two report types: event-level reports and summary reports.

There are always two (and sometimes three) components which work together to support reporting:

  • Website to browser communication. In cookie-based systems, information for conversions and ad engagements is attached to an identifier that allows you or an analytics service to join these events later. With this API, the browser associates conversions with ad clicks/views, based on your instructions, before it’s delivered for analysis. Therefore, your ad rendering code and conversion tracking must:
    • Tell the browser which conversions should be attributed to which ad clicks or impressions.
    • Signal any other data to include in the final reports.
  • Data collection. You'll need a collector endpoint to receive the reports, generated in users' browsers. The output from browsers could be one of two possible reports: event-level reports and aggregatable reports (which are encrypted, used to generate summary reports).

If you collected aggregatable reports, you'll need a third component:

  • Summary report generation. Batch aggregatable reports and use the Aggregation Service to process the reports to generate a summary report.

Design decisions

A key principle of Attribution Reporting is early design decisions. You decide what data to collect in what categories and how frequently to process that data. The output reports provide insights on your campaigns or business.

The output report can be:

  • Event-level reports associate a particular ad click or view (on the ad side) with data on the conversion side. To preserve user privacy by limiting the joining of user identity across sites, conversion-side data is very limited, and the data is noisy (meaning that for a small percentage of cases, random data is sent instead of real reports).
  • Summary reports are not tied to a specific event on the ad side. These reports offer more detailed conversion data and flexibility for joining click and view data with conversion data.

Your report selection determines what data you'll need to collect.

You can also think of the final output as an input for the tools you use to make decisions. For example, if you generate summary reports to determine how many conversions led to some total spend value, that may help your team decide what your next ad campaign should target to generate a higher total spend.

Once you've decided what you want to measure, you can set up the client-side for Attribution Reporting API.

Website to browser communication

While this API is in testing, your code must confirm the API is available and set the appropriate Permissions-Policy.

Attribution sources on a publisher's website connect with triggers on an advertiser's website.
Figure 1.

Attribution sources (publisher's website)

An attribution source is an ad-related event (a click or view), to which an adtech can attach the following kinds of information:

  • Contextual reporting data, such as the ad creative ID, information about the campaign, or geography.
  • A conversion target, as in the site that is the target of the ad where you hope the user will end. This tells the browser what source events correspond to specific conversions.

Once the data is collected for the attribution source, the browser adds the data to local storage, so it can later be matched with an attribution trigger.

Attribution triggers (advertiser's website)

The attribution trigger is the event which tells the API to capture conversions.

We recommend capturing the conversions that are most important to the advertiser, such as purchases. Multiple conversion types and metadata can be captured in summary reports.

This ensures the aggregate results are detailed and accurate for these events.

Match sources to triggers

When a browser receives an attribution trigger response, the browser accesses local storage to find a source that matches both the attribution trigger's origin and that page URL's eTLD+1.

For example, when the browser receives an attribution trigger from adtech.example on shoes.example/shoes123, the browser looks for a source in local storage that matches both adtech.example and shoes.example.

Filters (or custom rules) can be set to determine when a trigger is matched to a specific source. For example, set a filter to count only conversions for a specific product category and ignore all other categories. Filters and prioritization models allow for more advanced attribution reporting.

If multiple attribution sources are found in local storage, the browser picks the one that was stored most recently. In some cases where attribution sources are assigned a priority, the browser will select the source with the highest priority.

Data collection

Together, an attribution trigger matched to a corresponding source, are sent as a report by the browser to a reporting endpoint on an adtech-owned server (sometimes referred to as a collection endpoint or collection service). These reports can be event-level reports or aggregatable reports.

Aggregatable reports are used to generate summary reports. An aggregatable report is a combination of data gathered from the ad (on a publisher's site) and conversion data (from the advertiser's site) which is generated and encrypted by the browser on a user's device before it's collected by the adtech.

Event-level reports are delayed between 2 and 30 days. Aggregatable reports are sent with a random delay within one hour and the events must fit within the contribution budget. These choices protect privacy and prevent exploitation of any individual user's actions.

If you're only interested in event-level reports, this is the last piece of infrastructure you need. However, if you want to generate summary reports, you'll need to process the aggregatable reports with an additional service.

Summary report generation

To generate summary reports, you'll use the Aggregation Service (operated by the adtech) to process the aggregatable reports. The Aggregation Service adds noise to protect user privacy and returns the final summary report.

Aggregatable reports are collected, batched, and sent to the adtech environtment.
Figure 2. This diagram represents the asynchronous flow of data from the collection endpoint, batching reports, through processing on the adtech-owned Aggregation Service.

After batching the collected aggregatable reports the batch is processed by the Aggregation Service. A coordinator gives the decryption keys only to attested versions of the Aggregation Service. The Aggregation Service then decrypts the data, aggregates it, and add noise before returning the results as a summary report.

Batched aggregatable reports

Before the aggregatable reports are processed, they must be batched. A batch consists of strategically grouped aggregatable reports. Your strategy will most likely be reflective of a specific time period (such as daily or weekly). This process can take place on the same server which acts as your reporting endpoint.

Batches should contain many reports to ensure the signal-to-noise ratio is high.

Larger time periods lead to less noisy results.
Figure 3. Compare waiting 1 day and 1 week. In 1 hour, you'll have a smaller summary value with likely more noisy results. In one day, you'll have a larger summary value so it's likely to be less noisy.

Batch periods can change at any time to ensure you capture specific events where you expect higher volume, such as for an annual sale. The batching period can be changed without needing to change attribution sources or triggers.

Aggregation Service

The Aggregation Service is responsible for processing aggregatable reports to generate a summary report. Aggregatable reports are encrypted and can only be read by the Aggregation Service, which runs on a trusted execution environment (TEE).

The Aggregation Service requests decryption keys from the coordinator to decrypt and aggregate the data. Once decrypted and aggregated, the results are noised to preserve privacy and returned as a summary report.

Practitioners can generate aggregatable cleartext reports to test the Aggregation Service locally. Or, you can test with encrypted reports on AWS with Nitro Enclaves.

What's next?

We want to engage in conversations with you to ensure we build an API that works for everyone.

Discuss the API

Like other Privacy Sandbox proposals, this API is documented and discussed publicly.

Experiment with the API

You can experiment and participate in conversation about the Attribution Reporting API.

Last updated: Improve article

We serve cookies on this site to analyze traffic, remember your preferences, and optimize your experience.