Signed HTTP Exchange (or "SXG") is a subset of the emerging technology called Web Packages, which enables publishers to safely make their content portable, i.e. available for redistribution by other parties, while still keeping the content’s integrity and attribution. Portable content has many benefits, from enabling faster content delivery to facilitating content sharing between users, and simpler offline experiences.
So, how do Signed HTTP Exchanges work? This technology allows a publisher to sign a single HTTP exchange (i.e., a request/response pair), in the way that the signed exchange can be served from any caching server. When the browser loads this Signed Exchange, it can safely show the publisher’s URL in the address bar because the signature in the exchange is sufficient proof that the content originally came from the publisher’s origin.
This decouples the origin of the content from who distributes it. Your content can be published on the web, without relying on a specific server, connection, or hosting service! We're excited about possible uses of SXG such as:
Privacy-preserving prefetching: While prefetching resources (e.g., by link rel=prefetch) for a subsequent navigation can make the navigation feel a lot faster, it also has privacy downsides. For instance, prefetching resources for cross-origin navigations will disclose to the destination site that the user is potentially interested in a piece of information even if the user ultimately didn’t visit the site. On the other hand, SXG allows for prefetching cross-origin resources from a fast cache without ever reaching out to the destination site, thereby only communicating user interest if and when the navigation occurs. We believe that this can be useful for sites whose goal is to send their users to other websites. In particular, Google plans to use this on Google search result pages to improve AMP URLs and speed up clicks on search results.
Benefits of a CDN without ceding control of your certificate private key: Content that has suddenly become popular (e.g. linked from reddit.com's first page) often overloads the site where the content is served, and if the site is relatively small, it tends to slow down or even temporarily become unavailable. This situation can be avoided if the content is shared using fast, powerful cache servers, and SXG makes this possible without sharing your TLS keys.
Trying out Signed Exchanges
Signed Exchanges are available in Chrome 73 and later, and were previously available as an origin trial.
Creating your SXG
In order to create SXGs for your origin (as a publisher), you need a certificate key to sign the signature, and the certificate must have a special "CanSignHttpExchanges" extension to be processed as a valid SXG. As of November 2018, DigiCert is the only CA that supports this extension, and you can request the certificate that works for SXG from this page.
Once you get a certificate for SXG you can create your own SXGs by using the reference generator tools published on github.
You can also take a look at the actual SXG example files in the Chrome’s code repository (e.g. this one is the simplest one created for a simple text file). Note that they are generated primarily for local testing, please do not expect that they have valid certificates and timestamps in the signature.
Testing the Feature Locally
For creating SXGs for testing purposes, you can create
a self-signed certificate
chrome://flags/#allow-sxg-certs-without-extension to have your
Chrome process the SXGs created with the certificate without the special extension.
Code like the following should work if your server, certificate, and SXGs are correctly set up:
<!-- prefetch the sample.sxg --> <link rel="prefetch" href="https://your-site.com/sample.sxg" /> <!-- clicking the link below should make Chrome navigate to the inner response of sample.sxg (and the prefetched SXG is used) --> <a href="https://your-site.com/sample.sxg">Sample</a>
Note that SXG is only supported by the anchor tag (
in Chrome 73 and later. Also note that the signature’s validity is capped to 7
days per spec, so your signed contents will expire relatively quickly.
We are keen to hear your feedback on this experiment at email@example.com. You can also join the spec discussion, or report a chrome bug to the team. Your feedback will greatly help the standardization process and also help us address implementation issues.